Learning Coverage- and Power-Optimal Transmitter Placement from Building Maps: A Comparative Study of Direct and Indirect Neural Approaches

مقتطف من المصدر

تنظم هذه الصفحة محتوى عن الذكاء الاصطناعي والبحث لتسهيل قراءته والاستشهاد به والتحقق منه من قبل الباحثين والطلاب وأدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي.

arXiv:2604.22056v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Optimal wireless transmitter placement is a central task in radio-network planning, yet exhaustive search becomes prohibitively expensive at scale. This paper studies the single-transmitter setting under a fixed learned propagation surrogate, where exhaustive per-pixel evaluation remains tractable and provides surrogate-exact ground truth. We introduce a dataset of 167,525 urban scenarios (RadioMapSeer-Deployment) with dual surrogate-exact labels for coverage-optimal and power-optimal transmitter locations. Ground-truth analysis reveals an asymmetric coverage-power trade-off: coverage-optimal placement sacrifices 13.86% of received power, whereas power-optimal placement sacrifices only 5.50% of coverage; the best achievable balanced placement lies at $\bar{d}=2.60$ from the ideal point (100%,100%). We evaluate two learning formulations: indirect heatmap-based models that predict received-power radio maps, and direct score-map models that predict the objective landscape over feasible transmitter locations. Within the heatmap family, discriminative models deliver one-shot predictions 1350-2400x faster than exhaustive search, while diffusion models additionally support multi-sample inference that improves single-objective performance and, by reusing the same sample pool under a balanced criterion, recovers strong balanced placements without explicit multi-objective training. Dual score-map strategies combining power and coverage score maps match the exhaustive balanced optimum ($\bar{d}=2.60$) and remain close across smaller candidate budgets, at 14-22x speedups after candidate re-evaluation. Both formulations admit very fast one-shot inference; on this benchmark, dual score-map methods are strongest for balanced placement, whereas heatmap formulations remain attractive for their physically meaningful intermediate maps and, in the diffusion setting, for inference-time search.

عرض المصدر الأصلي

المصدر الرسمي أو الأصلي: arXiv Machine Learning. تحقق دائما من التفاصيل في المصدر الأساسي.

العودة إلى الذكاء الاصطناعي والبحث