AI & Research · arXiv AI · publications

Token Arena: A Continuous Benchmark Unifying Energy and Cognition in AI Inference

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2605.00300v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Public inference benchmarks compare AI systems at the model and provider level, but the unit at which deployment decisions are actually made is the endpoint: the (provider, model, stock-keeping-unit) tuple at which a specific quantization, decoding strategy, region, and serving stack is exposed. We introduce TokenArena, a continuous benchmark that measures inference at endpoint granularity along five core axes (output speed, time to first token, workload-blended price, effective context, and quality on the live endpoint) and synthesizes them, together with a modeled energy estimate, into three headline composites: joules per correct answer, dollars per correct answer, and endpoint fidelity (output-distribution similarity to a first-party reference). The framework's novelty is empirical and methodological. Across 78 endpoints serving 12 model families, the same model on different endpoints differs in mean accuracy by up to 12.5 points on math and code, in fingerprint similarity to first party by up to 12 points, in tail latency by an order of magnitude, and in modeled joules per correct answer by a factor of 6.2. We further show that workload-aware blended pricing reorders the leaderboard substantially: 7 of 10 top-ranked endpoints under the chat preset (3:1 input:output) fall out of the top 10 under the retrieval-augmented preset (20:1), and the reasoning preset (1:5) elevates frontier closed models that the chat preset penalizes on price. We release the framework, schema, probe and eval harness, and a v1.0 leaderboard snapshot under CC BY 4.0. TokenArena is a methodology, not a single ranking; we publish full provenance and limitations and welcome external replication.

Your DzCademia workshop

Assess a dataset or benchmark

A score needs data provenance, train/test separation and evaluation rules. Check licensing, coverage and possible overlap with model training data. Benchmark performance alone does not establish general capability.

A practical exercise

Choose a subset and specify what it measures. Compare methods using the same protocol and retain representative errors, not only average scores.

Record reference points

Topic: Token Arena: A Continuous Benchmark Unifying Energy and Cognition in AI Inference
Source website: arxiv.org
Publication date at source: 2026-05-05
Collection date on DzCademia: 2026-05-05

My preparation plan

An indicative personal list, separate from official documents or requirements. Checkmarks stay on this device; no account needed.

Check provenance, licence and version.Read split and evaluation rules.Define a baseline.Inspect representative errors.Document unsupported conclusions.

0 / 5 steps checked

Read the source

DzCademia advice and exercises are separate from the source summary and requirements. This structured aid uses automated assistance and is neither scientific validation nor a selection promise. Source consulted on 2026-10-28.

View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv AI. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research

Token Arena: A Continuous Benchmark Unifying Energy and Cognition in AI Inference

Assess a dataset or benchmark

A practical exercise

Comment with Google

Your browsing, your choices