Contact
Algeria - National academic platform
...
Prepare your scientific stay

Host laboratory · Invitation letter · Application guidance

Learn more

AI & Research · arXiv Machine Learning · publications

Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2605.13950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous language-model agents are increasingly evaluated on long-horizon tool-use tasks, but existing benchmarks rarely capture the complexity and nuance of real scientific work. To address this gap, we introduce Collider-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating whether LLM agents can reproduce experimental analyses from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) using only public papers and open scientific software. Such analyses are often difficult to reproduce because the public toolchain only approximates the software used internally by the experimental collaborations, while the published papers inevitably omit implementation details needed for a faithful reconstruction. Agents must therefore rely on physical reasoning, domain knowledge, and trial-and-error to fill these gaps. Each task requires the agent to turn a published analysis into an executable simulation-and-selection pipeline and submit predicted collision event yields in specified signal regions. These predictions are evaluated with standard histogram metrics that provide continuous fidelity scores without a hand-written rubric. We also report the computational cost incurred by each agent per task. Finally, we evaluate the codebase and full session trace using an LLM judge to catch qualitative failure modes such as fabrications, hallucinations and duplications. We release an initial set of tasks drawn from LHC searches, together with a containerized sandbox and event simulation tools. We evaluate across a capability ladder of general purpose coding agents. Our results show that on average no agent reliably beats the physicist-in-the-loop solution.

Your DzCademia workshop

Assess a dataset or benchmark

A score needs data provenance, train/test separation and evaluation rules. Check licensing, coverage and possible overlap with model training data. Benchmark performance alone does not establish general capability.

A practical exercise

Choose a subset and specify what it measures. Compare methods using the same protocol and retain representative errors, not only average scores.

Record reference points
Topic
Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction
Source website
arxiv.org
Publication date at source
2026-05-15
Collection date on DzCademia
2026-05-15
My preparation plan

An indicative personal list, separate from official documents or requirements. Checkmarks stay on this device; no account needed.

0 / 5 steps checked

Read the source

DzCademia advice and exercises are separate from the source summary and requirements. This structured aid uses automated assistance and is neither scientific validation nor a selection promise. Source consulted on 2026-10-28.

View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv Machine Learning. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research
369
Listed events
1419484
Total visits
2190
Visits today