Contact
Algeria - National academic platform
...
Prepare your scientific stay

Host laboratory · Invitation letter · Application guidance

Learn more

AI & Research · arXiv Machine Learning · publications

The Attribution Impossibility: No Feature Ranking Is Faithful, Stable, and Complete Under Collinearity

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2605.21492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: No feature ranking can be simultaneously faithful, stable, and complete when features are collinear. For collinear pairs, ranking reduces to a coin flip. We prove this impossibility, quantify it for four model classes, resolve it via ensemble averaging (DASH), and machine-verify it with 305 Lean 4 theorems. We characterize the complete attribution design space: exactly two families of methods exist -- faithful-complete methods (unstable, with rankings that flip up to 50% of the time) and ensemble methods like DASH (stable, reporting ties for symmetric features) -- and no method lies outside this dichotomy. The impossibility is quantitative: the attribution ratio diverges as 1/(1-rho^2) for gradient boosting, is infinite for Lasso, and converges for random forests. DASH (Diversified Aggregation of SHAP) is provably Pareto-optimal among unbiased aggregations, achieving the Cramer-Rao variance bound with a tight ensemble size formula. In a survey of 77 public datasets, 68% exhibit attribution instability. Switching to conditional SHAP does not escape the impossibility when features have equal causal effects. The framework includes practical diagnostics -- a Z-test workflow and single-model screening tool -- and has direct consequences for fairness auditing: SHAP-based proxy discrimination audits are provably unreliable under collinearity. The design space theorem, diagnostics, and impossibility are mechanically verified in Lean 4 (305 theorems from 16 axioms, 0 sorry) -- to our knowledge, the first formally verified impossibility in explainable AI.

Your DzCademia workshop

Check a publication method or promise

A video or journal-finding tool can shortlist titles, not guarantee acceptance. Check identity, scope, author instructions and possible fees at official sources. Do not choose solely on speed promises or one indicator.

A practical exercise

Compare two journals against your research question: fit, article types, instructions and verified terms. Keep unknowns as questions rather than assumptions.

Record reference points
Topic
The Attribution Impossibility: No Feature Ranking Is Faithful, Stable, and Complete Under Collinearity
Source website
arxiv.org
Publication date at source
2026-05-22
Collection date on DzCademia
2026-05-22
My preparation plan

An indicative personal list, separate from official documents or requirements. Checkmarks stay on this device; no account needed.

0 / 5 steps checked

Read the source

DzCademia advice and exercises are separate from the source summary and requirements. This structured aid uses automated assistance and is neither scientific validation nor a selection promise. Source consulted on 2026-10-28.

intelligence artificielle outil chercheur
View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv Machine Learning. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research
369
Listed events
1419484
Total visits
2190
Visits today