Contact
Algeria - National academic platform
...
Prepare your scientific stay

Host laboratory · Invitation letter · Application guidance

Learn more

AI & Research · arXiv AI · publications

An Explainable Header-Centric Framework for Large-Scale Semantic Table Interpretation and Data Quality Assessment

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2610.10541v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graph (KG) quality depends not only on downstream graph validation, but also on the quality of tabular metadata used before integration. In metadata-only Semantic Table Interpretation (STI), where cell values are unavailable, noisy, or unsuitable, column headers become a critical source of semantic evidence for traceable KG preparation. We present an explainable, header-centric framework for metadata-only Column Type Annotation (CTA) and Data Quality Assessment (DQA). The framework maps headers to 39 interpretable FinalFormat types using curated lexical resources and preserves token-level traceability through SourceKeywords. Each assigned type activates validation rules based on a taxonomy of Data Quality Issues (DQIs), producing detections such as missing data, duplicates, domain violations, wrong data type, and temporal mismatch. These detections are aggregated into HeadersIQ, a lightweight, unweighted data source-level quality metric. The framework was evaluated across heterogeneous benchmarks, including UCI, Prague, Kaggle, VizNet/Sato, SOTAB, T2Dv2, and the SemTab 2024 Metadata-to-KG track, comprising around 120,000 header columns. The results show broad practical coverage across noisy real-world metadata, while a parallel KG-mapping pathway supports alignment to DBpedia and Schema.org. On the SemTab 2024 Metadata-to-KG track, the official GT-strict evaluation was modest. However, a blinded diagnostic audit indicates that many mismatches reflect benchmark granularity, aliasing, and ontology-selection effects rather than wholly implausible header-centric predictions. We report this audit as diagnostic evidence on disagreement patterns, not as revised benchmark performance. Overall, the paper presents a reusable workflow for metadata-driven semantic annotation, data source-level quality monitoring, and KG-oriented benchmark diagnosis.

Your DzCademia workshop

Check a publication method or promise

A video or journal-finding tool can shortlist titles, not guarantee acceptance. Check identity, scope, author instructions and possible fees at official sources. Do not choose solely on speed promises or one indicator.

A practical exercise

Compare two journals against your research question: fit, article types, instructions and verified terms. Keep unknowns as questions rather than assumptions.

Record reference points
Topic
An Explainable Header-Centric Framework for Large-Scale Semantic Table Interpretation and Data Quality Assessment
Source website
arxiv.org
Publication date at source
2026-10-09
Collection date on DzCademia
2026-10-09
My preparation plan

An indicative personal list, separate from official documents or requirements. Checkmarks stay on this device; no account needed.

0 / 5 steps checked

Read the source

DzCademia advice and exercises are separate from the source summary and requirements. This structured aid uses automated assistance and is neither scientific validation nor a selection promise. Source consulted on 2026-10-28.

intelligence artificielle outil chercheur publication
View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv AI. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research
369
Listed events
1419973
Total visits
2679
Visits today