Contact
Algeria - National academic platform
...
Prepare your scientific stay

Host laboratory · Invitation letter · Application guidance

Learn more

AI & Research · arXiv AI · publications

The Silent Failures in Agentic Data Science

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2610.14115v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models have significantly lowered the barrier to writing code. Naturally, this has also led to the development of data science agents that promise automating the design and execution of data science from task formulation to model development. Existing evaluations of agentic data science (agentic DS) assess downstream predictive performance and code correctness, providing preliminary insight in agentic DS capabilities. We argue that these evaluations overlook the fundamental principles of data science: methodological data science- and domain knowledge. As such, only assessing downstream performance masks methodological failures such as data leakage and inappropriate validation, limiting the development of robust agentic DS systems. In this paper, we evaluate agentic DS beyond accuracy from three different angles: 1) a large-scale analysis of failure modes in common agentic DS frameworks and models across 220 data science tasks, 2) a reusable and extensible test suite with curated data science tasks that test for six specific failures in a controlled manner, and 3) a qualitative assessment of agentic DS pipelines against expert solutions on Kaggle competitions. We find that the majority of agentic solutions contain at least one failure mode despite the complexity of agentic harness or model capacity. Moreover, we identify a positive correlation between the occurrence of data leakage failures and predictive performance, confirming the necessity to evaluate agents beyond accuracy. Our qualitative analysis shows that DS agents generally lack problem solving creativity and domain knowledge, compared to competition-winning data scientists. We believe that principled failure mode analysis, as presented here, should be integral part of agentic DS evaluations, and that the insights we surface will be key in developing trustworthy agentic DS pipelines.

Your DzCademia workshop

Check a publication method or promise

A video or journal-finding tool can shortlist titles, not guarantee acceptance. Check identity, scope, author instructions and possible fees at official sources. Do not choose solely on speed promises or one indicator.

A practical exercise

Compare two journals against your research question: fit, article types, instructions and verified terms. Keep unknowns as questions rather than assumptions.

Record reference points
Topic
The Silent Failures in Agentic Data Science
Source website
arxiv.org
Publication date at source
2026-10-15
Collection date on DzCademia
2026-10-15
My preparation plan

An indicative personal list, separate from official documents or requirements. Checkmarks stay on this device; no account needed.

0 / 5 steps checked

Read the source

DzCademia advice and exercises are separate from the source summary and requirements. This structured aid uses automated assistance and is neither scientific validation nor a selection promise. Source consulted on 2026-10-28.

intelligence artificielle publication
View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv AI. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research
369
Listed events
1419976
Total visits
2682
Visits today