Universal Transformers Need Memory: Depth-State Trade-offs in Adaptive Recursive Reasoning

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2604.21999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study learned memory tokens as computational scratchpad for a single-block Universal Transformer (UT) with Adaptive Computation Time (ACT) on Sudoku-Extreme, a combinatorial reasoning benchmark. We find that memory tokens are empirically necessary: across all configurations tested -- 3 seeds, multiple token counts, two initialization schemes, ACT and fixed-depth processing -- no configuration without memory tokens achieves non-trivial performance. The optimal count exhibits a sharp lower threshold (T=0 always fails, T=4 is borderline, T=8 reliably succeeds for 81-cell puzzles) followed by a stable plateau (T=8-32, 57.4% +/- 0.7% exact-match) and collapse from attention dilution at T=64. During experimentation, we identify a router initialization trap that causes >70% of training runs to fail: both default zero-bias initialization (p ~ 0.5) and Graves' recommended positive bias (p ~ 0.73) cause tokens to halt after ~2 steps at initialization, settling into a shallow equilibrium (halt ~ 5-7) that the model cannot escape. Inverting the bias to -3 ("deep start," p ~ 0.05) eliminates this failure mode. We confirm through ablation that the trap is inherent to ACT initialization, not an artifact of our architecture choices. With reliable training established, we show that (1) ACT provides more consistent results than fixed-depth processing (56.9% +/- 0.7% vs 53.4% +/- 9.3% across 3 seeds); (2) ACT with lambda warmup achieves matching accuracy (57.0% +/- 1.1%) using 34% fewer ponder steps; and (3) attention heads specialize into memory readers, constraint propagators, and integrators across recursive depth. Code is available at https://github.com/che-shr-cat/utm-jax.

View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv Machine Learning. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research