Contact
Algeria - National academic platform
...
Prepare your scientific stay

Host laboratory · Invitation letter · Application guidance

Learn more

AI & Research · arXiv Machine Learning · publications

A Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Upper Confidence Bound Algorithms in Adaptive Deep Neural Networks

Source excerpt

This page presents AI and research content to help researchers, students and AI tools read, cite and verify the information.

arXiv:2604.24810v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Edge computing environments impose strict constraints on energy consumption and latency, making the deployment of deep neural networks a significant challenge. Therefore, smart and adaptive inference strategies that dynamically balance computational cost or latency with predictive accuracy are critical in edge computing scenarios. In this work, we build on Adaptive Deep Neural Networks (ADNNs) that employ the Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) framework. Current literature leverages the first version of the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB1) strategy to dynamically select the optimal confidence threshold, enabling efficient early exits without sacrificing accuracy. However, we introduce four additional Upper Confidence Bound strategies in ADNNs, namely UCB-V, UCB-Tuned, UCB-Bayes, and UCB-BwK, and perform, for the first time, a comparative study of these strategies with respect to trade-offs between accuracy, energy consumption, and latency. The proposed UCB strategies are employed on the ResNet and MobileViT neural networks, and are evaluated on the benchmark datasets of CIFAR-10, CIFAR-10.1, and CIFAR-100. Experimental results demonstrate that all strategies achieve sub-linear cumulative regret, with UCB-Bayes converging the fastest, followed by UCB-Tuned and UCB-V. Finally, UCB-V and UCB-Tuned dominate the Pareto Frontiers of accuracy-latency and accuracy-energy trade-offs.

Your DzCademia workshop

Check a publication method or promise

A video or journal-finding tool can shortlist titles, not guarantee acceptance. Check identity, scope, author instructions and possible fees at official sources. Do not choose solely on speed promises or one indicator.

A practical exercise

Compare two journals against your research question: fit, article types, instructions and verified terms. Keep unknowns as questions rather than assumptions.

Record reference points
Topic
A Comparative Analysis on the Performance of Upper Confidence Bound Algorithms in Adaptive Deep Neural Networks
Source website
arxiv.org
Publication date at source
2026-04-29
Collection date on DzCademia
2026-04-29
My preparation plan

An indicative personal list, separate from official documents or requirements. Checkmarks stay on this device; no account needed.

0 / 5 steps checked

Read the source

DzCademia advice and exercises are separate from the source summary and requirements. This structured aid uses automated assistance and is neither scientific validation nor a selection promise. Source consulted on 2026-10-28.

View the original source

Official or original source: arXiv Machine Learning. Always check the details against the primary source.

Back to AI & Research
369
Listed events
1419444
Total visits
2150
Visits today